Have you ever Googled your own name and been amazed by the
results?
My grandfather was not an intensely private person. Nor was he a public figure. However, he was known and respected in the small
community of Vernon, British Columbia, Canada.
His name does not appear on the Internet. My father followed his father’s footsteps,
building on his reputation. He was known
for his hard work and respected for his integrity in the growing community. But his reputation was not based on any
notoriety. There is little mention of
him on the Internet. When I was growing
up in Vernon it was still a small town of under 10,000 people. Despite similar upbringings as my
forefathers, for better or for worse, my life story, the details of my work and
even aspects of my private life are available at the present a button. They may be researched by anyone with a
computer and access to the Internet.
What difference does that make?
“Person of Interest” is an award-winning television program
that highlights the pervasive nature and potential of the computerized
surveillance we have on this very un-private planet. The original season started with this
description:
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system: a
machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it. I
designed the machine to detect acts of terror, but it sees everything. Violent
crimes involving ordinary people, people like you. Crimes the government
considered irrelevant. They wouldn't act, so I decided I would. But I needed a
partner, someone with the skills to intervene. Hunted by the authorities, we
work in secret. You'll never find us, but victim or perpetrator, if your
number's up... we'll find you".
When one simply looks around at the proliferation of
security cameras and readily available personal information, this fictional
drama series seems eerily close to reality.
A recent TED Talk by Jeff Hancock called “The Future of Lying” suggests that because of the ability to trace our deeds, our words, our stories,
communicated by technological means we are more likely to be truthful. The fact that our lives, to a greater or
lesser extent, are captured and converted to data that can be retained
indefinitely means that we can be caught “lying” more easily than ever before.
Like it or not, each of us is unwittingly writing a
comprehensive autobiography comprised of digital information readily available
to anyone and everyone. As in “Person of
Interest”, this information may be accurate or misleading, used for good or
evil, but there is no escaping the fact that it exists.
As a person with Parkinson’s disease, I feel confronted
with the reality that, whether I write this blog or seek to escape into
obscurity, I am writing my own story, recording my own self-titled, digitized
song. Perhaps it shouldn’t matter, but the
fact that my “life story” will be more public than the histories of my father
or grandfather leads me to ask, “What kind of story will it be?”
Will the predominant theme of my story be ‘me’ or others? Will it be characterized by self-indulgence
or self-sacrifice?
Who will have benefited from my life? Who will have been harmed by the way I have lived?
Will I have fought for the right or silently condoned the
wrong? If the truth were known (as it
may well be) will I have lived with integrity, courage and grace? Or will I be seen as having given in to a value-neutral,
insipid and hypocritical attitude?
When my digital footprints on
this globe are accurately assembled, will the journey they mark out have been
worthwhile? When my less-than-perfect
pathway has been technologically memorialized for others to view, will it be
worth following? Will I have lived
intentionally, or by simply existed accident?
When someone Googles my life and struggles
with PD, my highs and lows, will the results encourage others or leave them
with a sense of hopelessness?
No doubt, you are a person of influence, intellect, integrity and inspiration.
ReplyDelete